STOP UNDUE INFLUENCE in U.S. elections

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES

Due to NONDELEGATION  DOCTRINE violations, the first pillar of an administrative state, in which the Legislative Branch abandons their duty in regards to election procedures, giving the Executive Branch near full authority over adoption of new voting standards, and effectively breaching the separation of powers.

APPOINTED ELECTION OFFICIALS WIELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

As an effect of NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE violations, Executive branch Chief Election Officials of state and federal governments exercise complete autonomy in the adoption and implementation of election procedures, in a manifestation of the second pillar of an administrative state, EXECUTIVE CONTROL OF AGENCIES.

LAWFUL ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS LITIGATED OR STALLED

While timely limitations for election contests are enforced by the same agencies stalling investigations, effectively violating citizen’s right to conduct a timely, independent audit. This is an effect of THE ABOVE TWO PILLARS called PROCEDURAL RIGHTS, the third pillar of an administrative state.

JUDGES ISSUE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OBSCURE RULINGS

Related to election security, due to NONDELEGATION-violating statutes deferring to an Executive Agency for clarification, resulting in JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, the fourth pillar of an administrative state.

AGENCIES EXERCISE AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE AND ENFORCE RULES

And adjudicate disputes with the force of law due to THE ABOVE FOUR PILLARS facilitating the fifth pillar of an administrative state; AGENCY DYNAMICS. This results in agencies investigating themselves when questions arise regarding their practices.

WE MUST DEMAND OUR REPRESENTATIVES TAKE BACK THEIR PLENARY POWER TO CREATE ELECTION LAWS, AUTHORIZE NEW PROCEDURES, ADD DUE PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF STATUTES, and BIND EXECUTIVE AGENCY OFFICIALS TO THE WILL OF THE DULY ELECTED LEGISLATURES.